Skip to main content

For Whom the Bell Trolls




Amidst the many amusing developments triggered by the Covid-caused shut down was the one in the teaching domain. The mandatory shift to online Education caught many, if not all, of those involved in the art of teaching by surprise. Even the so called who shout for the Online-Raj, in fact, were not really sure how this could be achieved overnight. In the middle of all the hue and cry, finally the schools opened in the State with the education channel airing the lessons for the Young learners, certainly with mixed reception. the yeah-sayers hailing it and the nay-sayers decrying the move, not on grounds of quality but of reach and access. 

 What was amusing was the story of a troll in the middle of it. One of the lessons aired for the kindergarten kids was trolled in the social media and the hell broke loose. This act of 'ragging' was followed up and the culprits were booked. There was a stringent warning issued to all that such irresponsible acts of trolling online lessons will be seriously dealt with. Later there was a lot of appreciation, rightly, for the teacher who handled the lesson and they say that now the whole state can claim to have thousands of young teachers who model themselves on the said teacher- in tone and rhythm, rhyme and scheme. Though it is too early to say how the story will end while it comes to the prank of the youngsters, this triggered certain line of reflection in me.

It needs no restating that the teacher in question did a very good job. Except for those who were looking to cash in, in the form of controversy, on the first State level online-only teaching experience, there was nothing worth questioning here. But my question is was it necessary to book those who trolled the session? On the one hand, even with the trolls still out, the online lessons would continue and we will get used to it. As it happens all around, trolls on the one side and life and practices on the other side would go on. To a good extent the troll-targets will be aware about the possible trolling while they design themselves. The teachers will be mature enough to know what to take and what to leave. Trolls are a new category and the world around is gradually coming to grips with it. Trolls are not cartoons of the digital kind on the one side while neither are these simply, silly young tech-travagance. There definitely is a serious element of criticism involved, though one comes across plenty of trolls which fail to impress in anyway and do not make the cut.

When the community /authority (did it look a bit protean?!) polices trolls (not just trolls in the bad taste or trolls which celebrate vulgarity and  not those which run counter to legal obligations), of all kinds, we seem to have a problem. Why is it necessary to ban trolling teachers while they do it online? Will this apply later, be extended to trolling all kinds of classes? Will there be a ban on teacher trolls? If this act is to set some kind of a standard, will this later stretch to all kinds novel practices? I mean whenever a new mode, a new model or practice is going to be set, will we protect it for a while saying that trolls destroy confidence and sully the practitioner? When a new minister struggles to speak in her/his first press conference, can people troll? Will a troll on it attract the law? If a new head of a Nation errs in diplomatic courtesy, will trollers get a chance? Or will that be a reason for being booked?

In the case of online education, it can’t be treated as new. It has been around for a while. Education channels too have been around for longer than that. So the guard-the-new-practice theory doesn’t seem to hold here. Did the troll upset the said teacher? or was the whole teacher fraternity demoralized, really? Or did it in fact hit much higher than that? Was the act takes an affront to the powers that be? Did they  overreact in the urge to push the online-lesson policy?  Did the Covid-pressure temporarily disengage our better sense? The point is not to back all the trollers all the while. What I am trying to drive home is that we will have to learn to live with the trolls. Or we will have to also stop trolling others or placing a ban on all trolls too. Of course it would be excellent if we can put in place a mechanism which helps us differentiate between the acceptable and unacceptable trolls, without drawing very firm lines as to what we are tolerant to and not. This but is not an easy job and that realization is easy if one is on the other side of the divide. 

Teachers all across, belonging to higher and lower rungs of education, perhaps will be glad about this turn of events. But then when the boot is on the other foot too, they will have to oblige! They sure need to be trained to perform well (which the teacher in reference certainly did), but also to be made strong enough emotionally (and intellectually too, in terms of skills and scholarship, if that is where the problems lie!) to take the criticism which comes rightly or occasionally wrongly in the stride, in whatever form it comes- be it student trolls or even govt policies!

Comments

  1. Ys. We must learn to live with trolls just like we should learn to live with Covid...and be strong enough to discern acceptable and unacceptable criticism.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Well written peppered with problematics in humour.

    ReplyDelete
  3. "Trolls are a new category and the world around is gradually coming to grips with it. Trolls are not cartoons of the digital kind on the one side while neither are these simply, silly young tech-travagance. There definitely is a serious element of criticism involved, though one comes across plenty of trolls which fail to impress in anyway and do not make the cut."- the most relevant point. And the title, simply brilliant!!!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

On Foregrounding the Backdrops

    On Foregrounding the Backdrops Much of my liking for large pictures has lot to do with the backdrops and the 'others' in the frames. By others I mean the also-rans, in a way! But this is more about the past when pictures were not so common, when not everything could be shot and framed, as we do now. Magazines with photos were a premium then and colour pics even harder to come by. Rather than the ones who were the focus, meant to be the focus, my eyes would involuntarily wander off to the rest of the things and people who have been caught by the camera. It is their looks, expressions, postures, feels, appearance, that my senses will work on. The man in the middle, or men, those on whom the story is supposed to zero in, will fade out and the backdrop will zoom in. Imagination tracking those to their illogical conclusions constituted my act of reading the pictures. It was such a delight as it helped one keep the trivial off and enjoy the core of the margins. When on

Can Politics Empathise?

  E. M. Forster wrote about the need for ‘tolerance’ and argued that the real force which can help rebuild the world after the World Wars will be not love or forgiveness, but 'tolerance'. Though I read that essay long back during student days, as it was ‘taught’ as part of curricular requirement, it was 'studied' and then abandoned, in a way. But still the argument of the essay kept coming back, as it does now. I didn't grasp quickly the inherent link between empathy and tolerance, but there sure is a reason why Forster showed up. There are many ways the two, tolerance and empathy, complement each other and the presence of the former can surely help build the other. Empathy is the capacity to know and experience how others feel, putting yourself in another's position. But is there something like political empathy? Why is it not there, generally speaking? I would like to explain political empathy as the capacity of one politica

A Course for all Horses?: Rethinking NET Coaching at HEIs

  Isn’t it time we rethought the excessive thrust attached to providing National Eligibility Test (NET) Examination Coaching to students at College / University campuses? There are many colleges in the Country which spent a lot of time and energy singularly focusing on making the Postgraduate students clear the NET examination. As a Teacher License Test which will enable them to take up teaching as a vocation, it is significant. Though it is fine to make the students capable of cracking the NET / JRF Tests, the lopsided importance attached to the same invites a rethink. For a number of reasons, there must be reservations on putting all your money in the NET Exams. Teacher-promotion of teaching as the only serious vocation too is a troublesome thought. To begin with, of the plethora of career pathways which open up after the graduation/ postgraduation, that of teaching at College / University level is just one. Though community may attach more value and significance to it, it stil