Skip to main content

Alive and After






Alive and After

Jacintha saldhana has left the world. A prank of the Australian Radio Jockeys left the Indian nurse with few other options. Are we richer in terms of experience after that? Has the event been cathartic enough to clean us off , purge the media off,  the stinking trail of money and success?  What has made me thinking in this direction is an interesting picture I came across in connection with the upcoming burial of the nurse’s body  in India. The newspaper carried report of the tragic death and aftermath of the nurse and traced the track of the remains of the poor woman. It gave details of the funeral on another page. 


 



The ‘news/ad’ item that triggered these thoughts carried a headline which said, “ Watch the emotional memorial service of Jacintha with Alive on your phone”. It is hard to make the category out: was it an ad? It doesn’t look like that. Then was it a news item. That seems (un)likely. What was it then? The ‘news’ which appeared on 16 December  2012 in a leading English daily item kept me thinking. What is the motive behind this item? 

It need not be asserted that the demise of the Indian nurse was quite unfortunate and the kind of media prank which is a crude combination of Paparazzi and key hole journalism should be severely reprimanded. Sometimes even the pranks of the harmless kind one comes across in a ‘Just for Laughs’ brand of comedy show makes one wonder whether this will adversely affect the rather vanishing tribe of do gooders. When a woman who ran into help an accident victim realizes that she was being duped, will she, wont she, hesitate a while when she confronts a similar situation in the future? This is clearly a case of the royalty- obsessed media snooping off more than it can show/ tell. 

An app may be free of cost. Internet has lots of such apps which can be downloaded for no cost whatever. The same seems to be the case of Alive too. The object of my thoughts is the need and logic for this ‘alive-ness’. A mind which is open to share and empathize with the rest of the community, a willingness to be a participant in the worries of the larger humanity around is no foreign value for us. But the today’s common sight of mobile flashing crowd which leaves nothing unshot is sickening. Whether it is an accident or the remains of a body, a wrecked vehicle or an animal caught. This is not to mention the repulsive sight of funerals too being shot by upheld mobile gadgets. 

What’s immoral in recording an emotional event and keeping it alive?, the question is possible.  Nothing,  for sure.  The heaviness of the tragedy has long back sunken in. The moral rage it has unleashed too is justified. In England, against the backdrop of the Leveson Report, this should be another body blow to the media which is often caught with its cameras turned to where its back should be. But, was the soft urge by the newspaper to input better humanism into its readers’ mobiles and tab/ lap screens innocent? Was it just playing by the rules of engagement of the contemporary comedy of mobilers?

In the age of the visual, are we overshooting, over-watching ourselves? Are we leaving the bigger questions behind in the rush for the run for the picture?  If a picture can equal a thousand words, what does the contemporary picture of picture seekers reveal? Jacintha fell by the mock call of the Australian Radio Jockeys. Now we can fall for the visuals. The innocent newspaper has in all magnanimity offered us the opportunity to carry our compassionate curiosity to its logical conclusion.
 





Comments

  1. Aswathi20 December 2012 at 08:21

    Yea sir..It is high time to deconstruct the hidden intention of the picture seekers as this mania has degenerated to the level of an assault literally.I too felt in the same way when came across the photos of the gang rape victim on Facebook.Those who posted the pictures pretend to sympathize and this is confessed to be their protest against rapes through virtual platform.What I felt was that it is not that innocent as it seems to be. How could these ,the so called "cyber activists" do this..Assaulting the once assaulted again in terms of sympathy..That picture got so many likes too..This is nothing but voyeurism..I have been ashamed of myself being a part of such a group..Anyway congrats for your venture(s).because we shouldn't cast the stones of silence and at times should forget the saying if speech is silver silence is golden..

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

On Foregrounding the Backdrops

    On Foregrounding the Backdrops Much of my liking for large pictures has lot to do with the backdrops and the 'others' in the frames. By others I mean the also-rans, in a way! But this is more about the past when pictures were not so common, when not everything could be shot and framed, as we do now. Magazines with photos were a premium then and colour pics even harder to come by. Rather than the ones who were the focus, meant to be the focus, my eyes would involuntarily wander off to the rest of the things and people who have been caught by the camera. It is their looks, expressions, postures, feels, appearance, that my senses will work on. The man in the middle, or men, those on whom the story is supposed to zero in, will fade out and the backdrop will zoom in. Imagination tracking those to their illogical conclusions constituted my act of reading the pictures. It was such a delight as it helped one keep the trivial off and enjoy the core of the margins. When on
13 comments
Read more

Can Politics Empathise?

  E. M. Forster wrote about the need for ‘tolerance’ and argued that the real force which can help rebuild the world after the World Wars will be not love or forgiveness, but 'tolerance'. Though I read that essay long back during student days, as it was ‘taught’ as part of curricular requirement, it was 'studied' and then abandoned, in a way. But still the argument of the essay kept coming back, as it does now. I didn't grasp quickly the inherent link between empathy and tolerance, but there sure is a reason why Forster showed up. There are many ways the two, tolerance and empathy, complement each other and the presence of the former can surely help build the other. Empathy is the capacity to know and experience how others feel, putting yourself in another's position. But is there something like political empathy? Why is it not there, generally speaking? I would like to explain political empathy as the capacity of one politica
12 comments
Read more

The Profes'sorry'ate!

If what was reported in the social media sometime ago was true, an MLA once asked a Minister whether Professorship category existed in Colleges. The reply from the Education Minister was that it doesn't, even though, they say, the response was from the minister who designated himself as Professor! The tendency to brand oneself as professor among College faculty members is on the rise for while. Many of those who have even recently joined the educational service as faculty prefix a Prof. before their names. Or, that is what I feel when I go through some of the reports in the media regarding College activities. As a result almost all of the college faculty are entitled to be designated Professors that way! Some relate this with seniority. If you have been in service for a while, have been teaching long, then you can stick the label on you. Or you can allow others to stick it on you. It grows on you and you take a new feel about who you are! A Professor Babu enables you to be
8 comments
Read more