Skip to main content

Generation Traps



It is universal, apparently immortal too, to blame the young for not learning form the old. Each senior generation finds it hard to figure out the inability on the part of the young to read the old right and get their lives straight. Education to romance, careers to commerce, driving to digitalising, the areas of disagreement are as multiple as there are passions and prejudices. When there are those who have already taken the path and ready to look back and take stock, to comment, analyse and articulate, it is pretty simple for the young to learn from it. How come they don't do that ? When the been-there-done-that species of the past is ready to educate the ones getting ready to arrive, why do they turn their backs on it and decide to go it alone?

 Think that it happens. That the young have made a manual of what the previous generations have done and been doing, and have schematised the rights and the wrongs, and have decided take on life fully loaded with these insights, how different will lives be? The so-looking-road more travelled by with trodden tracks and signposts, legends and markings, skeletons and shed skins, what will be the nature of the lives it prepares the young ones to? Will they traverse the highway to a future where all is rosy, building on the gains or otherwise of those who walking in to their long days journey into the night? A young journey sans pitfalls and hidden mines, a path which has anaesthetised troubles, dredged of the mud of madness?

 From the lesson of the elders that peace is more valuable, productive than war, what will the young make? If they make a principle of it, and keep off from fighting among themselves, will it be good for them? Imagine a hoard of utopian children in a peace that defies understanding! How effectively, undisturbingly will they rework our attitude to what childhood means? If learning involves learning by doing, if true learning has to be founded on experience, then will that learning they have picked from their seniors stick? Will it wear off?

  If we pass on to them what we have learned from the corruption in public life to them, what will they make of it? When they begin to take to heart the mammoth stories of deception and treachery that the ruling class have indulged in, what lesson will they learn from it? Will they decide to weed out the corruption or will they keep off it? The almost insurmountable piles of ill gotten wealth and power that the seniors flaunt before the young, will it teach them to take to their routes or to head a lonesome track or to be amply cynical?

 If the young learn, pretty easy and damn quick, that age can wither and custom stale the non infinite charm of the body, will it turn them ignore their bodies and appearances? When they learn that appearances are more often than not deceptive, will they begin to care a fig for that? If so, what will be the world like? A generation which will be unkempt from the word go? A surrender even before the fight has begun? If the young learn from the old that chances have played an incredibly huge role in making the world what it is, will the young give into drifting? What will be the place for the corporate rant of grabbing the opportunities, single minded devotion, Steve jobs like insight and that blah blah? If the young learn that for every Gates who made it high there are thousand who didn't, where will that take them to?

 On the flip side, if the young chooses to make a religion of the work hard motto of the seasoned and ripe seniors, and get down to work like the proverbial asses, will that lead to the making of the promised land? If they learn that satisfaction is what rally matters and that will be hard to get hold of, what will the young look ahead to? Where will they anchor themselves and their thoughts? A generation which says no to fast food, a generation which cuts TV time dramatically, a generation which rises early and hits bed late, a generation which takes exercises to the heart, a generation which keeps of sugar and fat, a generation which attempts digital celibacy... How will that be?

 Or should each one learn it afresh? Each generation going through and picking it ones way? Imagine a generation which has really taken stock of the past, learned thoroughly what the seniors did with their lives, how inspiring will that be to them to pick up from where the elders have left off?

 The answer is blowing in the wind ......

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

On Foregrounding the Backdrops

    On Foregrounding the Backdrops Much of my liking for large pictures has lot to do with the backdrops and the 'others' in the frames. By others I mean the also-rans, in a way! But this is more about the past when pictures were not so common, when not everything could be shot and framed, as we do now. Magazines with photos were a premium then and colour pics even harder to come by. Rather than the ones who were the focus, meant to be the focus, my eyes would involuntarily wander off to the rest of the things and people who have been caught by the camera. It is their looks, expressions, postures, feels, appearance, that my senses will work on. The man in the middle, or men, those on whom the story is supposed to zero in, will fade out and the backdrop will zoom in. Imagination tracking those to their illogical conclusions constituted my act of reading the pictures. It was such a delight as it helped one keep the trivial off and enjoy the core of the margins. When o...
13 comments
Read more

Can Politics Empathise?

  E. M. Forster wrote about the need for ‘tolerance’ and argued that the real force which can help rebuild the world after the World Wars will be not love or forgiveness, but 'tolerance'. Though I read that essay long back during student days, as it was ‘taught’ as part of curricular requirement, it was 'studied' and then abandoned, in a way. But still the argument of the essay kept coming back, as it does now. I didn't grasp quickly the inherent link between empathy and tolerance, but there sure is a reason why Forster showed up. There are many ways the two, tolerance and empathy, complement each other and the presence of the former can surely help build the other. Empathy is the capacity to know and experience how others feel, putting yourself in another's position. But is there something like political empathy? Why is it not there, generally speaking? I would like to explain political empathy as the capacity of one politica...
12 comments
Read more

The Profes'sorry'ate!

If what was reported in the social media sometime ago was true, an MLA once asked a Minister whether Professorship category existed in Colleges. The reply from the Education Minister was that it doesn't, even though, they say, the response was from the minister who designated himself as Professor! The tendency to brand oneself as professor among College faculty members is on the rise for while. Many of those who have even recently joined the educational service as faculty prefix a Prof. before their names. Or, that is what I feel when I go through some of the reports in the media regarding College activities. As a result almost all of the college faculty are entitled to be designated Professors that way! Some relate this with seniority. If you have been in service for a while, have been teaching long, then you can stick the label on you. Or you can allow others to stick it on you. It grows on you and you take a new feel about who you are! A Professor Babu enables you to be...
8 comments
Read more