Skip to main content

The Seminar Industry





The academia around is keen to make some fast bucks on the flourishing seminar industry. More and more colleges are jumping into small scale industry called running national and international seminar because it is seen as an easy way to raise fund for the college. Not many questions are raised by the participants who either are mere participants or are contributing papers to be read in the seminar. End of a seminar, the balance sheet looks pretty promising and in the rush to reap the monetary gain principles and ethics are thrown to winds. 

 National and international seminars are being organized in the country more often than not with financial assistance from the University Grants Commission (UGC). UGC often provides decent financial support for the organizing colleges and departments to run the show. It also promotes fund raising by the college through registration fee from the participants. But what is happening in the guise of the seminars and conferences is often far from what the UGC has envisaged. The organizing institutions are beginning to fleece the enthusiastic participants by charging exorbitant amounts from them. The amount collected from the paper presenters and the participants in a national seminar often vary between Rs. 500 to Rs. 1500. If it is an 'international event', then the price tag will still shoot up. When an outsider does the preliminary kind of calculation regarding the revenue generated, the take home at the end of the programme is pretty handsome. Are the seminars turning quickly into events where fund raising takes precedence over issue raising, conscience raising or even problem debating? 

UGC has shifted to an API Score format for evaluating performances of the college and university level teachers. To move up the promotion ladder, seminar / conference participation  / paper presentation is where the teachers can score some points. Thus the teachers would naturally try to gather points by presenting / participating in these programmes. This is where the eye of the fund-conscious organizers lie. This is where the entrepreneurship urge of the academicians turn turn its tail up too. When money gains upper hand, academic concern may take the backseat. The economics is rather straight forward. More registrations, better income. A world where each college teacher is trying to gather targeted API score, abstracts for presentations will sure flow in. Rs. 500 - 1500 may be big amount, but not big enough not to sacrifice for the sake of the potential promotion. The participating academicians get points for career promotion  and the organizing academician get the event promoted. Looks like a clean win-win kind of offer. 

But there are collateral damages of the serous kind in the process. When the eye is  on money, an anything-goes-attitude begins to build up. It gets increasingly difficult for the organizers of the seminars to reject an abstract since abstracts bring money in. By extension, when all abstracts are accepted with no quality filtering, time becomes a serious constraint. Each presenter is mad to run through the presentation and often time for worthy discussion is the casualty. When the presentations are run in parallel sessions, the available audience gets split and not much worthy audience will be available to listen through and to interact with the presenter. A pedestrian crowd may be neither informed nor inspired to be part of the interaction. If quality questions are a vital gain from a seminar presentation, helping the presenter to fine tune and to reposition the arguments, that is well neigh impossible in the seminars, generally speaking. 

The fall in quality we experience in seminars seems to be inversely proportional to urge to raise funds. Cashing in on the drive to pocket API scores, the institutions of higher education around are giving into dilution of academic quality. This phenomenon has to be looked into by the authorities concerned. Otherwise soon we will come to experience seminars as exercises in inanity where mediocrity is celebrated and nothing but fund raising is promoted. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

On Foregrounding the Backdrops

    On Foregrounding the Backdrops Much of my liking for large pictures has lot to do with the backdrops and the 'others' in the frames. By others I mean the also-rans, in a way! But this is more about the past when pictures were not so common, when not everything could be shot and framed, as we do now. Magazines with photos were a premium then and colour pics even harder to come by. Rather than the ones who were the focus, meant to be the focus, my eyes would involuntarily wander off to the rest of the things and people who have been caught by the camera. It is their looks, expressions, postures, feels, appearance, that my senses will work on. The man in the middle, or men, those on whom the story is supposed to zero in, will fade out and the backdrop will zoom in. Imagination tracking those to their illogical conclusions constituted my act of reading the pictures. It was such a delight as it helped one keep the trivial off and enjoy the core of the margins. When o...
13 comments
Read more

Can Politics Empathise?

  E. M. Forster wrote about the need for ‘tolerance’ and argued that the real force which can help rebuild the world after the World Wars will be not love or forgiveness, but 'tolerance'. Though I read that essay long back during student days, as it was ‘taught’ as part of curricular requirement, it was 'studied' and then abandoned, in a way. But still the argument of the essay kept coming back, as it does now. I didn't grasp quickly the inherent link between empathy and tolerance, but there sure is a reason why Forster showed up. There are many ways the two, tolerance and empathy, complement each other and the presence of the former can surely help build the other. Empathy is the capacity to know and experience how others feel, putting yourself in another's position. But is there something like political empathy? Why is it not there, generally speaking? I would like to explain political empathy as the capacity of one politica...
12 comments
Read more

The Profes'sorry'ate!

If what was reported in the social media sometime ago was true, an MLA once asked a Minister whether Professorship category existed in Colleges. The reply from the Education Minister was that it doesn't, even though, they say, the response was from the minister who designated himself as Professor! The tendency to brand oneself as professor among College faculty members is on the rise for while. Many of those who have even recently joined the educational service as faculty prefix a Prof. before their names. Or, that is what I feel when I go through some of the reports in the media regarding College activities. As a result almost all of the college faculty are entitled to be designated Professors that way! Some relate this with seniority. If you have been in service for a while, have been teaching long, then you can stick the label on you. Or you can allow others to stick it on you. It grows on you and you take a new feel about who you are! A Professor Babu enables you to be...
8 comments
Read more